First conversation
You describe the situation. We ask what has already been tried and who inside the company it affects. No charge, no obligation.
Four practices, one bench, one line of accountability.
A client's problem rarely fits one specialty. We build a team around it instead of selling a service off a price list.
A company that needs a contract reviewed usually also needs the process behind it fixed and the system that produces it to work. Those three jobs normally mean three suppliers, three briefs and nobody responsible for the seam between them.
Every engagement has someone who holds it end to end. They pull in specialists from the practices and answer to you for the schedule.
The first meeting exists to understand the problem. Pricing comes once it is clear what needs doing and why it is worth doing.
We hand over something that works: a process in use, a contract signed, a system running. A report is not a result.
If a problem sits outside what the group does well, we say so at the first meeting rather than stretching a practice to cover it.
The same sequence whichever practice leads it.
You describe the situation. We ask what has already been tried and who inside the company it affects. No charge, no obligation.
We look at the real documents, systems and numbers, then write down what the problem actually is. Sometimes this is the whole engagement.
A fixed scope with named people, a schedule and a figure. If the scope changes later, we re-quote rather than letting it drift.
We finish when the thing works in your hands, and we stay reachable afterwards for the questions that only appear in week three.